Court Coverage |
|
|
Today's News
Last updated at Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:53:56 GMT
To be clear, when I say men's tennis, I am really talking about the interactions of three players. Maybe four, if we want to be generous and include Andy Murray, who has yet to win a Grand Slam, and keeps grabbing for that glory, only to pull the doorknob off in his hand.
...They are as formidable and as entangled a trio as tennis has ever witnessed—as silly as it is to get into generational comparisons, it's fair to say that the great three of Borg, McEnroe and Connors (26 combined Slams) are on the run, in their flowing hair and short-shorts.
These days are like those good old days.
...
"Today I only slept for a couple of hours ... but it was worth it," Djokovic said a photo shoot at the Carlton Gardens. "All this effort that we both put in last night on the tennis court was incredible. It was something that we will both remember forever."
But the five-time grand slam winner said it would also take time for his achievement to sink in."Now I will have time to enjoy the success because it's not just about winning a grand slam. It's really more than that. The way that we played yesterday makes me feel very proud of what I achieved."
The level rose in the second; Djokovic's particularly, as the Serb settled into a rhythm, found some forehand range, started to wrest control.
There have been other challenges, of course, notably the period of doubt after a poor first-round loss to Daniela Hantuchova in Doha last February; and the time Azarenka considered quitting the sport and going to university instead. ''But I was kind of building my mountain, rock by rock, climbing, climbing, climbing, so it doesn't matter how I got here really. I enjoyed the whole journey,'' she said. ''And I just want to enjoy it all the way to the end of my career.''
But Djokovic v Nadal lacks points of difference...
At one point mid-match (during the second set), their numbers were almost identical - winners, unforced errors, forehand winners, forced errors. They were playing the same game. If the record is not compelling, the manner in which Djokovic withstood Nadal's passionate rally in the fourth set, and came from 2-4 down in the fifth set, was incredible. Somehow, on jelly legs, Djokovic out-fought the game's greatest fighter to the final point ...
The budding Djokovic-Nadal rivalry? Incredible in last night's incarnation. But it will be only when Nadal turns the tables on Djokovic in a grand slam final that their battle is truly joined. And, given the next grand slam is in Nadal's Roland Garros fortress, probably not even then.
No one has tried harder to fathom the new Novak than the old Rafa and although he almost succeeded on Rod Laver Arena, the end came in what has become the familiar fashion of Djokovic getting one more ball back into play and then thumping away a giant winner and letting out a full-throated, manic roar.
By the time the Australian Open presentation aired after 1.30am there were still 2.41 million people watching, an extraordinary result for that time of night.
The lowest audience number for the Open last night was 1.39 million ...Djokovic, rightly, will be lauded as a deserving champion but Nadal underlined his reputation as one of the most courageous players to grace Rod Laver Arena. He, too, returned from the brink in the fourth set to ensure this match a place in history.
It is a match so superb that it will be discussed whenever the great grand slam finals are discussed. It is also a most fitting finale to an extraordinary Australian Open.
From Bernard Tomic's come-from-behind victory over Fernando Verdasco to the epic semi-finals between the world's four best players, the quality of tennis on display has been staggering.
The women's game is challenged constantly. Outspoken players are too often and too easily labelled prima donnas. They are unfairly begrudged equal prizemoney when they do not play their grand slams over five sets.
...We should stop the women's tennis bashing - except for the grunting, that just has to be stopped - and appreciate it for the wonderful sport that it is.
"It's got a little garden so my grandmother can do her stuff in there," said Azarenka, who credits her family for giving her the work ethic to succeed.
...But no Belarusian had lifted a major singles trophy until now.
"Emotions are too much, I can't really relax yet," Azarenka said yesterday reflecting on her 82-minute 6-3 6-0 win over a six-time finalist in Sharapova. The tall Russian, whose parents were raised in Belarus, has three grand slam trophies and told Azarenka to cherish her prize.
"I am very hungry. I want to be better and better every day I step on to the court, or do work in the gym," Azarenka, now on a 12-match winning streak, said.
January 28...he found out drug testers were looking for him. "Just a bit annoyed ... I know the players go on about it a lot, but they've changed these rules with the drug test," Murray said. "I've just done the drug test, the urine test." Tennis Australia sources last night told the Bulletin officials were considering slapping Tomic with a "please explain" for tarnishing the image of the sport during the Australian Open -- their showpiece event. But in fact he is still only 24, a young man searching for the answers that might unlock his potential. After yesterday’s match — in which he spent the majority of the five sets dictating terms to world No 1 Novak Djokovic — he is clearly a step closer to turning that key. The worry for Murray's new and apparently influential coach, Ivan Lendl, is that his charge did everything but deliver the coup de grace. It is something that you cannot teach. It is something of the blood that is not to be found even in the most superior coaching manual. It was another defeat at the tail-end of a Grand Slam tournament, another day when his lifetime's ambition remained unfulfilled. In his longest ever match at 10 minutes short of five hours, and one of the truly stirring tennis fights – of this Australian Open, this week or this era – Murray lost once more to the player who can fairly lay claim to being the best in the world, Novak Djokovic, who beat him so completely in the 2011 final. A major tennis tournament will inevitably get critics talking about grunting. With the Australian Open in full swing, the critics are shouting out once more. As a tennis fan, it's not something that has ever really bothered me. The constant debating of it in the press, however, does. In what is certain to be a leading candidate for 2012 match of the year, Novak Djokovic beat Andy Murray in the Australian Open semifinals 6-3, 3-6, 6-7 (4), 6-1, 7-5. It's nearly impossible to exaggerate the quality of this match. Run through the checklist of what it is we ask of an epic event -- swaying momentum, courage, accuracy, nerve, offense, defense, drama -- and you mark off the boxes, one by one. The Belarussian was lethal inside the baseline and in her return games in the first set, saw Clijsters yank her around when the Belgian muscled up in the second set, and then in the third set with the crowd roaring for "Aussie Kim," she kept coming. She put her blinders on, continued to attack, and seemed to hit every return an inch inside the baseline. On her first match points her hands felt like they weighed 200 kilos and she doubled faulted . On her second match point, she hit forehand down the middle, Clijsters pulled a backhand wide and she knelt down, fist- pumped and then cried some tears of joy after her 6-4, 1-6, 6-3 victory. a good three hours, the semifinal between Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray here was, to put it bluntly, a mess. Both players were fighting themselves as much as the guy across the net. Djokovic was battling his body, his nose, his allergies, his nerves. He was trying, with intermittent success, to settle down and let the athleticism flow like it had last year. It took him until the fourth set to shed all of his burdens and start looking like the best player in the world again. Still, they all seem to approach the game with something more than the score in mind, like they're playing with some abstract ideal of the tennis point as their goal. It's not go fish, or blackjack, or trench warfare. It has to be tennis, and it has to be great. At least, that's what I think about when I'm watching them. I have no idea what they're thinking. Maybe they want nothing more than to win at any cost. ...What describes the top three isn't their raw competitiveness. It's the particularity of their styles.4 Federer is so light on his feet, the way he dances in and out of his split-steps and the way he controls the points with a variegated mixture of shots. Nadal's game is dynamic and vertical, stubborn and smart, and its improbability is part of the pleasure. People call Nadal a warrior, but that speaks as much to the martial quality of his overall style. His huge heart is part of his whole game. Djokovic's style is much more horizontal and efficient-looking, with his brilliantly compact backhand and his perfectly timed slides. He plays like a machine, with an almost unnervingly inhuman quality. Even his body looks efficient, like he's eaten the exact number of calories for maximum stamina, speed, and power, and not one too many or too few. I'm half convinced that his outrageous win streak last year was the result of a secret algorithm. Most players eat something during long matches, whether it be power gels or bananas or protein bars. What was strange about this is that Djokovic felt the need to eat the unidentified object behind the [towel]... Why the mystery? After 4 hours and 50 minutes of the most extraordinary tennis — some of it ordinary, much of it brilliant and all of it riveting — Djokovic went through, 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 7-5. The pair met here in last year's final but that straight-set victory for the Serb pales when compared to the drama that kept the prime minister of Australia, Rod Laver, Ken Rosewall, Frank Sedgman and other champions gasping in their seats until 12:35 a.m. in Melbourne as these two incredible athletes ran, reached and lunged in prolonged rallies which defied belief. The real battle ignited midway through the fifth set. Djokovic led 5-2, but Murray wouldn't go away. At 5-3, Djokovic was serving for the match, but uncharacteristically failed to close it out, losing his serve at love with the last two shots being powerful Murray forehand winners. Here’s an argument for your barstool this weekend: Men’s tennis is the most entertaining sport around. Discuss. The case is an easy one if we limit the survey to this weekend. There’s no football for the first time in months (the Pro Bowl doesn’t count), and basketball and hockey are in their midseason nadirs. Elsewhere: Is Tiger Woods still playing? When’s the next World Cup? Where’s Albert Pujols playing again? Here’s your best sporting option: early Sunday morning, in American time zones, Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal will play in their third straight Grand Slam final. Stop asking questions. Don't even pretend that there are answers. Just embrace present day women's tennis for what it is: Unpredictable, whacky, nervous, suspenseful, and, for all its faults, remarkably entertaining. But when Friday night had turned into Saturday morning in Melbourne and Novak Djokovic lay spread-eagled on his back with a serene look on his stubbled face, the status quo had been preserved. It will be power and competitive fire against power and competitive fire Saturday when Maria Sharapova and Victoria Azarenka meet in the women’s final at the Australian Open. It will be expatriate against expatriate, two-handed backhand against two-handed backhand and, just in case you thought we were in danger of neglecting the obvious, it will be shriek against shriek. We understand if you prefer to watch that match in an endless loop on replay — because we know there are not that many insomniacs who watched it live — rather than tune in for the women’s final. It’s not that Victoria Azarenka and Maria Sharapova aren’t marvelously talented and lovely, and fighting for the No. 1 ranking, it’s that their match might be about as pleasant to watch as a livestock auction. Tomorrow, a weary Novak Djokovic will play Rafael Nadal in a third consecutive grand slam final. Same combatants, different venue. Nadal has never played Federer in three finals on the trot. Djokovic and Nadal have won the past seven slams. Tennis has confirmed a new order that has almost gone unnoticed. Initially Tomic contacted former Gold Coast mayor and qualified lawyer Lex Bell to act on his behalf, but this afternoon Mr Nyst and his associate Jason Murakami visited the budding star at his parents' Southport home. Police say the 19-year-old was issued with two tickets after twice being intercepted driving his high powered BMW M3 yesterday afternoon. For all her shoulder issues and serving yips, Maria Sharapova was always known as one of the sport's steeliest competitors; for all her talent, volatile Victoria Azarenka was, well, not. The cause of his anguish still isn't entirely clear, but he'll continue wearing a heavy bandage around his right knee at least until he knows. ''Twenty four hours before I played my first match, I was in my hotel room crying because I believe I didn't have the chance to play in Melbourne,'' he said. ''Two weeks later, I am here in the final. So it's a dream for me.'' I completely agree that many spectators present apparently have no interest in sport whatsoever - only things such as tennis player-based celebrity gawking and soap opera, and being seen publicly in face paint beyond the primary school age where this might be deemed vaguely acceptable. Rafa... A couple of years ago, we saw him on a flight from Madrid to Rome, after he won the final there. We were on some budget airline, there was no first-class on this flight, so we were surprised to see him on it. There were all these kids on the flight, on spring break, and they couldn't believe it when Rafa walked on. For the whole two- hour flight there was a steady stream of people wanting to get his autograph, and he signed one for pretty much everyone. Even the pilot came back. It's probably the last time he's flown that airline, but he came on with a bag of McDonald's. He's an incredible athlete. You see him at breakfast eating chocolate doughnuts. He must just be an amazing genetic specimen. As Azarenka put a full-stop on the Australian Open career of Kim Clijsters yesterday, only chair umpire Evanthia Asderaki did not appreciate the magnitude of the Belarussian's agonising acoustics. After a barely audible sound in the crowd, Asderaki demanded: ''As a courtesy to the players, please keep the noise down during play.'' For Clijsters, the four-time grand slam winner, it was a disappointing end to a difficult summer. In her Brisbane International comeback from an abdominal issue thigh spasms curtailed her semi-final against Daniela Hantuchova. Then, in the Open's fourth round, an ankle was sprained before four match points were saved against Li Na. For Clijsters, the four-time grand slam winner, it was a disappointing end to a difficult summer. In her Brisbane International comeback from an abdominal issue thigh spasms curtailed her semi-final against Daniela Hantuchova. Then, in the Open's fourth round, an ankle was sprained before four match points were saved against Li Na. It's not that we're not mates - we're good friends - but I'm already learning from Ivan the importance of conserving energy, of using your time wisely; and playing football four or five days before a tournament isn't the best thing to do. It is fun - don't get me wrong - but there are other things you are better off doing before a grand slam. While disappointed to lose 6-7 (7-5) 6-2 7-6 (7-5) 6-4 in another classic against Nadal, Federer insisted he would move on. And quickly. After all, he has lost just twice in the past five months, both in epic grand slam semi-finals. While disappointed to lose 6-7 (7-5) 6-2 7-6 (7-5) 6-4 in another classic against Nadal, Federer insisted he would move on. And quickly. After all, he has lost just twice in the past five months, both in epic grand slam semi-finals. January 25“No,” he said. “I don’t think so.” ...Nadal and Federer were to renew their long-running rivalry Thursday night in the first semifinal. Djokovic and Murray will play Friday night. “And now ... May the tournament begin,” wrote the veteran Ivan Ljubicic in a Twitter message. So it would seem. This is the third time in the last four Grand Slam tournaments those same four players have reached the semifinals. But the players once pegged for success rarely can be found on the sport's biggest stages. Few of these players, all highly touted juniors between 24-26 years old, has ever cracked the top 100. ...Some, such as Brendan Evans, Scoville Jenkins and Scott Oudsema, hung up their rackets and returned to school. Others, slog away on the outer reaches of the sport. Evans, who last fall enrolled at the University of Virginia, has few regrets. But he thinks he and his cohorts would have benefited from some time in school. "I think we all should have gone to school for a year or two," says Evans, who is pursuing an economics degree. "I think we got the wrong message. We were supposed to be the next great generation. That's a lot to put on the shoulders of 17-year-old kids, expecting them to be in the top 20 in a year or two. People propped us up to be better than we were. By 21, we were cast off." But for many, it is Sharapova's haughty, often sullen demeanour that makes her hard to love. Despite her unfortunate childhood address, the woman does not radiate charm. Particularly in press conferences, where a look of utter contempt often crosses her face after she is asked a reasonable question, prompting reporters to check their shoes for dog droppings. Perhaps Sharapova's sour manner is the protective mechanism to be expected of a woman exposed to the world by a demanding father at a tender age. ...Predictably, Sharapova was less jocular when told Agnieszka Radwanska had suggested the WTA Tour should investigate grunting. ''Isn't she in Poland?'' she sniffed of the beaten quarter-finalist. Besides: ''No one important enough has told me to change or do something different,'' Sharapova said. And therein lies the problem with Maria. Too often she gives the impression no one is more important than herself. It was around 2.30am Wednesday by the time we won the third set. It was rough on all the guards and the locker room attendant, because he had to stay there until 3am, just for us. There were still about 10 drivers waiting around and we didn't think we'd have to do any press at 3am, but there were two reporters who had stayed and wanted to do a couple of articles, so that was wild. When you lose, you have to do drug testing, so the poor Polish guys had to stay back and do that. A lot of times, when you're dehydrated, that can take ages, sometimes two hours just to go in the cup. They had to come back and play mixed doubles today, so that was rough. ... Here I am again in a semi-final of the Australian Open. After the past two years reaching the quarters of this tournament and not being able to finish well in the matches - I had to retire in 2010 against Andy Murray and last year got injured after the third game against David Ferrer - finally I am playing again in a semi and I'm very excited about it. For me, it is very important and a happy moment to start the season. Win or lose, it is a good start considering the end of the season I had last year with many doubts. It truly is funny, both due to the context of the match but also because of Lendl's reaction. They were playing in an exhibition match, a mixed doubles of all things, when it happened. The perfect hit. Lendl lined up Emilio and thumped a forehand that smashed him in the chest and sent him straight to the ground. And the funny thing about it? Lendl just started laughing while Emilio was writhing on the ground in pain. ...That, though, is a lot different to what happened between Berdych and Almagro. In case you are not aware, Almagro thumped a forehand that hit Berdych on the arm but then, after winning, Tomas refused to shake hands with his opponent. I was watching on television and I don't think I've heard someone booed like that after a tennis match. Don't get me wrong. I'd be annoyed too if someone lined me up, but I can't believe that he didn't shake hands. Berdych tried to justify it by saying there is an unwritten rule that Almagro had broken, but I think he has it wrong on this one. John McEnroe's behaviour was accepted for the nave and timid reasons that he brought people and money to the game. The sport lost its self-respect in the process. According to new ATP boss Brad Drewett, the game globally has never been more popular. ...And so women's tennis would make a lot more noise, too, if it just stopped the screaming. "They are so respectful in Melbourne. The stadium goes all quiet," he said. "This is when I am like, 'Oh my god, I am emotional.' It has happened more often than not in Australia." ...And, certainly, one that Nadal is looking forward to. "The ranking is important, but when we talk about a player who has won 16 grand slams and I won 10 -- and we played a lot of matches between each other -- all the ones (have been) very important moments for our careers and very high moments," he said. "For everything . . . all the matches against him are special and will be special even if we are 20 against 25." "There was a lot of good points. Most of the fun points he was winning," he said. Nishikori, who effectively announced his arrival as a player of prominence this fortnight when becoming the first Japanese player to reach the Australian Open quarter-finals in 80 years, indeed claimed the most fun point of the match when trailing 1-3 in the first set. It did not last the 42 strokes of a rally a game earlier but it nonetheless demonstrated the touch and skill of both players. After chasing down a lob volley from Murray, he surprised the Scot by returning the compliment, although his lob was a trick shot played between the legs. Following the victory, he admitted struggling but put it down more to an exacting first set lasting 59 minutes than any physical problem. "After the first two games, I was thinking, 'Wow, this is going to be a long night,'. I was very lucky to get through the second set," Djokovic said "You have to hang in there, especially with a player like Ferrer. He is a great competitor (and) I needed to come up with the winners. "I wasn't feeling very fresh after playing one hour, one set." Following the victory, he admitted struggling but put it down more to an exacting first set lasting 59 minutes than any physical problem. "After the first two games, I was thinking, 'Wow, this is going to be a long night,'. I was very lucky to get through the second set," Djokovic said "You have to hang in there, especially with a player like Ferrer. He is a great competitor (and) I needed to come up with the winners. "I wasn't feeling very fresh after playing one hour, one set." Ominously, Murray says he would like to be more ''robotic'' on the court, like Lendl. What next? Maria Sharapova pledging to become more self-absorbed? Williams was in trouble in her fourth-round match against Ekaterina Makarova, to be sure. But she has found trouble before and blasted her way out of it. Nobody fights like Williams; nobody plays the big points better. A match point was saved with an ace. Another match point saved, and then another. Finally, on the fourth attempt at closing out the win of her life, Makarova rifled a return back at Williams and the American missed with her backhand. Makarova, unheralded until now and ranked 56th in the world, held her arms to the sky. ... The Russian earned every point, slapping her ground strokes, blocking back Williams' first serve when it landed in, and serving well herself. Williams served so badly she could not even utter the word she thought would describe it. ''I served like a … I guess that's not appropriate. I served, I don't know. I can't even describe how I served, to be honest. It wasn't good, though. My lefty serve is actually better than that. Maybe I should have started serving lefty.'' Williams served seven double faults, and four in one game, at 2-2 in the second set when it all overcame her. She made too many errors, period. ''She [Makarova] went for broke on a lot of her shots. I made 37 [unforced] errors. That kind of tells the story of the match.'' He was only stopped by the world No1 Novak Djokovic on Rod Laver Arena in the early hours of this morning. In a final gesture, Hewitt took a set off the reigning Australian Open, Wimbledon and US Open champion to lose 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-3. ..."Last few months, I've just really been focusing on trying to get as much out of myself as possible this Australian summer, more so here in Melbourne," Hewitt said. "So now I'll focus on that. But right at the moment, I don't know." But he doesn’t intend giving away the shots of adrenalin just yet, especially before his hometown crowd. "Towards the end of the third set and the whole fourth set, the crowd got involved in it. It's great. They're the moments you play tennis for, to be out there in those situations.["] Kvitova looked mildly frustrated yesterday with all the talk about the No 1 ranking. "I try to be focus only on the tennis and think of nothing else around," she said. "I mean everybody is talking about the first position. But, you know, many players can be No 1 after this tournament. So it doesn't matter to talk about this right now." "I thought it was best he retired because it was pointless," Murray said after securing a place in the quarter-finals in well under an hour (6-1 6-1 1-0 ret). "He wasn't running. The people probably weren't enjoying the match that much. I certainly wasn't because nothing was happening. Sometimes it is just best to stop. There was nothing happening on the court." ...For Kukushkin, it was a miserable way to finish the biggest match of his professional career. Having endured 10 sets of gruelling tennis in his previous two matches against Viktor Troicki and Gael Monfils, Kukushkin woke on Sunday morning to discover he could barely lift his left leg. What was soon diagnosed as a hip flexor injury meant the Russian-born Kukushkin could not run and had no power on his serve, which he failed to hold throughout the entire match. Marcos Baghdatis provided a flashback to some of the excesses of tennis's recent past with his display of self-indulgent petulance on Wednesday night. If the sport genuinely cared about the messages it transmits through such incidents, the Cypriot would have been hit with a sanction to deliver some genuine contrition. Then there are the screechers and groaners. When, in her US Open final against Sam Stosur, Serena Williams gave an anticipatory yelp of triumph while a ball was still in play, she was rightly penalised. Yet the game indulges players, female and male, who make far louder, more distracting, and - one suspects - less spontaneous sounds almost every time they play a shot. Indeed much of the grunting occurs after shots are completed. The same goes for Lucille. She knows there's 'Regular Mike' and 'Tournament Mike'. As Tournament Mike he's a little bit more needy, a little bit more selfish. Sometimes she'll catch him at home and say 'are you still in tournament mode?' That kind of stuff doesn't fly at home, but we get away with it on the road and we actually get pretty pampered. Everything revolves around us being happy, which is kinda weird. It's tempting to say that McEnroe, to borrow from his most celebrated utterance, cannot be serious. Regardless of whether Tomic should have ''owned up'', one cannot imagine ''Mac'' doing the same... If the brat is all but gone, a new, unsavoury tactic and form of gamesmanship has taken its place - the well-timed medical time-out. Players today call for trainers when they're hurting and can force their opponent, who might be on a hot streak, to sit down and go cold. It is clear that this rule is being exploited ruthlessly by players to reverse the flow. Newk considers the misuse of medical time-outs to be a travesty. ''The medical breaks they're taking are a joke,'' he said. ... It's an equal-opportunity sport The prize money may still favour [sic (for Grand Slams)] blokes but tennis is one sport in which there is as much interest - if not more - in the women's game [sic?]as there is in the men's. ... The commentators What do they know? How can you not love the whingeing about the commentary team? It is part of the tradition. Boofheads and know-nothings stating the bleeding obvious - ''that ball was clearly out'' - while trying to get into the minds of people focused only on the next 200km/h serve. ...Sharapova is making light work of opponents, but doing it heavy in the reading stakes. The Russian superstar revealed George Orwell's 1984 was on her bedside table. "My trainer actually picked it up for me ... I have to be nice and read it," Sharapova said. "He spent $20 on it ... so got to be nice." ...Sharapova is making light work of opponents, but doing it heavy in the reading stakes. The Russian superstar revealed George Orwell's 1984 was on her bedside table. "My trainer actually picked it up for me ... I have to be nice and read it," Sharapova said. "He spent $20 on it ... so got to be nice." ...Sharapova is making light work of opponents, but doing it heavy in the reading stakes. The Russian superstar revealed George Orwell's 1984 was on her bedside table. "My trainer actually picked it up for me ... I have to be nice and read it," Sharapova said. "He spent $20 on it ... so got to be nice." ...Sharapova is making light work of opponents, but doing it heavy in the reading stakes. The Russian superstar revealed George Orwell's 1984 was on her bedside table. "My trainer actually picked it up for me ... I have to be nice and read it," Sharapova said. "He spent $20 on it ... so got to be nice." As the setbacks stacked up, Llodra became increasingly baffled, and by the final set he had resorted to clowning around. He hit “tweener” shots through his legs, threw up absurdly high lobs, and even imitated Murray’s grunt on the final point of the match. “Every point seemed to be a fun point. He was coming up with some unbelievable gets on the volleys and I was managing to dig up a lot at the net,” Murray said. He was happy, too, to have his father, Willie, make an appearance. "It was a Christmas present from me and Jamie. He's been to the US Open and Wimbledon, I don't think he has been to the French. He went to Sydney for a few days and really enjoyed it. He is due to go back Thursday but I hope to keep him here a bit longer." “Venus changed her diet, and we live together, so I can’t bring bad food into the house,” Serena Williams said. “I kind of joined the train instead of being off it. I’ve always been a pretty clean eater, but I’ve just never, like, been this clean.” Williams said she was eating more vegetables and uncooked foods and rarely ate meat, but her diet did not protect her from more health concerns. She tore ligaments in her left ankle during her warm-up tournament in Brisbane, forcing her to race the clock to get ready for the Open... But she has moved and played surprisingly well, producing big serves at critical phases and continuing to generate the intimidating pace that has helped make her a champion (she has the fastest serve of the women’s tournament so far: 118 miles per hour). “I think she’s fine,” said Aleksander Bajin, her longtime hitting partner. “Too bad she twisted her ankle, but after three days we were out there hitting balls again. We didn’t waste any time.” You can be sure that Hewitt's focus was on nothing other than a fuzzy yellow ball as he tried to track the 140 miles per hour serves of the powerful young Canadian Milos Raonic and when he won by 4-6, 6-3, 7-6, 6-3 the Australian collapsed in a sweaty heap while 15,000 people rose to acclaim their hero. The scenario for a victory carried on well into the second set. Raonic was belting the forehand with authority, hitting the backhand fine – including two beauty down-the-line winners – and serving well enough that he did not face a break point in his first eight service games. But once Hewitt broke to 5-3 on an overhead hit just long by Raonic, the tide had turned. Gradually Hewitt neutralized his opponent’s power, with Raonic later explaining that the 30-year-old Aussie’s ability to keep the ball low had caused him problems that he was unable to correct technically. Hewitt called on all his guile and savvy to hang on and eventually take control – but just barely. It probably all hung on the third-set tie break, which was an uneven affair that ended with Raonic missing a high forehand volley into the net. It was a shot that Hewitt later said the Canadian would make “99 times out of a 100.” Raonic was a gracious loser, giving Hewitt a solid handshake accompanied by quick verbal exchange at the net. Later in the media interview room he went further: “Doesn’t matter how hurt he’s been, how old he is,” Raonic said, “he’s as much of a competitor as he always was. He got me with that.” When Ivanovic also won the next three points, rather than it being advantage to the Serb, Lang called, "Game," even though Ivanovic had served the last point on the deuce side. ..."I thought I was up 40-0, and we're on the deuce side, and then it just didn't feel right," King said. "I got really confused." King said she didn't think to question Lang. "Sometimes I forget the score," she said. "I was confused but I had to move on because we went into the next game. I couldn't dwell on it too long, but if someone would have yelled at me I would have addressed it." Kings said nerves had a role in playing on a show court. "I hadn't played in a big stadium in a while," she said. "It wasn't her game or anything. I wasn't able to relax and focus on what I needed to do." “I think it's pretty mild compared with what happened [in the past],” he said. “I mean, before the guys were way worse behaved and said way, way worse things to the umpires. "I saw some clips of John McEnroe yesterday, I think he was playing Anders Jarryd in Sweden, [and] he's like smashing bottles like into the stand and stuff.” Asked whether he would enjoy rewinding the clock, and playing in a more free-wheeling atmosphere, Murray came up with an interesting response. "For you guys” – ie. the reporters exploring the subject – “it would probably be more interesting. [But] I think tennis nowadays, because of the level of it, you don't really need all the other stuff.” On this point, he is probably right. It is easy to romanticise the 1980s, because it was an era of bitter rivalry between powerful characters. But to our modern sensibilities, constant griping and caterwauling from the leading players would soon become an irritation rather than a thrill. Even when Serena Williams tore into the chair umpire during last September’s US Open final, it hardly made for edifying viewing. ...As members of the media industry, we have done more than anyone to take the sharp edges off the game. Physicists say that by the very act of observing an event you you change it, and that is unarguably true in this case. ..Yet there is still plenty of passion on show in top-level tennis; it could hardly be otherwise, when the sport represents a form of ritualised hand-to-hand combat. Here they are: ROGER FEDERER: “It’s going to be a good match. Obviously Raonic is on the rise, and Lleyton such an established player and playing with home crowd advantage. “I haven’t seen Raonic play in a while now because of injury or whatever happened. I practiced once with him in Wimbledon, so I got a chance to hit some with him there. “I think it’s going to be an open match because Lleyton doesn’t give away anything. I’ve seen that happen so many times that I’ll just pick Lleyton because he’s playing well and he’s playing at home.” PAUL ANNACONE (former player and Roger Federer’s coach): “I think with Milos’s game, he can compete with anybody. It’s obviously going to be a challenge playing Lleyton here. With Lleyton, it’s tough to say because he hasn’t played a lot of matches. He looked pretty good last night (Thursday against Roddick) even though Andy got hurt. His style of play makes you work so hard point for point for point. With young guys, it’s a bit of a challenge to do that over three-out-of-five sets.Prediction: “It’s tough...if Lleyton had been playing a bunch, it would be much easier. With Milos’s power, he’s in there in every match. Raonic.” “I don’t know if there is an answer to that question,” Tomic said. “Just pray to God. Maybe he’ll be sick or something. I got to go out there and have fun. Playing Roger is an experience that I’ll always remember.” Tomic is emerging and improving at the sort of pace teenagers usually reserve for typing text messages. “He’s progressed a lot,” Federer said. “Four months ago, I would have said I preferred playing him on hard courts rather than grass, but I’m not sure I still feel the same way. We’ll see.” What Tomic and the 23-year-old Dolgopolov share is an irresistible urge to carve shots that less subtle young men would be inclined to rip. The result was a deeply pleasing and paradoxical match that was both a peek at the future and a throwback as they traded sliced, single-handed backhands on the crosscourt diagonal for big stretches. Isner had a nasty blister on his toe that bled through his sock and other toe issues, said his coach, Craig Boynton. He was fortunate to get to five sets, since Lopez failed to serve out the second. ...Wozniacki made a concerted effort to move forward, approaching the net 25 times. Was that because of the wrist (an effort to end points quicker) or because she wants to improve that aspect of her game? Maybe both. Even though she won only 15 of those points, it's a positive development. "I've worked quite a bit on my volleys," Wozniacki said. "I still think I could have finished up a few more points up there, but I'm improving and I'm trying to move in when I can sometimes." Wozniacki is in the midst of changing her two-handed backhand volley to a more orthodox one-hander. ...None of the young Americans interviewed in Melbourne offered any criticism. Instead, they said the contact gap is an unfortunate byproduct of an individual sport where globalization, large sums of money, and celebrity seal top players off from their peers. "They become superstars," said Vania King, 22, who upset No. 15 seed Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova of Russia on Thursday to reach the third round here for the first time. "You don't see many of the top female players going out and helping the younger generation." The experience gap is particularly pronounced when compared to the current crop of American men. Fueled by their eagerness to suit up for Davis Cup, players such as Andy Roddick and Mardy Fish have routinely trained with younger American men and actively mentored prospects such as Sam Querrey and Ryan Harrison. They are close-knit and chummy. King, Hampton and McHale have all had some contact with Venus on Fed Cup teams. But the sisters have played sparingly for their country in recent years. Serena, for instance, has not participated in Fed Cup since 2007. Nor have the sisters been regular faces on tour. His raised racquet and eyebrow went unnoticed, he won the point and the game, leaving Dolgopolov fuming and playing catch-up for the rest of the set. But the 19-year-old denied he challenged the call. "I looked at the ref, but I didn't say a thing, I continued to play," Tomic said. "In my mind, I didn't challenge." "During anti-doping control, I was washing my hands and the doctor incredibly accused to me of throwing water at him. "Two injustices - one inside and another one outside the court. I am going to appeal the sanction." "Isn't it like a mirror? Jesus," he said. "It was like I was playing myself. Wow." Tomic may yet have a career in Canberra as a politician post his time on court, such was the extent of the spin he deployed on the ball last night. In Dolgopolov, he had an equally talented and willing adversary. The slice has been somewhat undervalued in an era of prodigious top spin but to watch these artists carving at a ball as if dismembering a Christmas roast was both a joy and a masterclass that showed just how offensive a weapon the spin can be. As commentator Bruce McAvaney quipped, Tomic played "cat and mouse with the dog", not that Dolgopolov was short of magic himself. "We have become buddies," Pat Cash says of the way Tomic has been embraced by the public this summer. "If you are Australian, whatever name you have you have a nickname." After victory last night, Tomic has progressed further in the tournament than he managed last year. And tournament organisers agree this Australian Open has been all about Bernie. On the days he has played, television figures have soared. |
Reuters Headlines
|