|
Washington
Mutual (WM, NYSE)
Last Updated October
06, 2001
Humans do but monkeys don't know
that scratching the wound directly may lead to serious
complications, even death. I don't know by design or accident, but
the U.S. Federal Reserve does not wish to attack the current
economic problem directly either. I am sure they knew that prior to
the September 11, the U.S. economy was well on its way to recovery;
problem was the technology sector. And even after the disaster,
problem for the economy and the stock market is not the consumer but
technology over-build. Lowering interest rates will do little to
solve that problem although it will alleviate the potential global
recession facing us now. This stock market meltdown is not like
previous ones and the recession may also be quite different.
While it is too early to predict,
consumer is not the culprit and is likely to bounce back quite soon
as long as the layoffs don't accelerate and house prices don't take
a nosedive. In the mean time, we are all receiving an unexpected
gift of lower interest rates, lower than any time in the recent
past. This, as in the past, will have a positive impact on certain
sectors. Unfortunately that will not include technology. Not any
time soon, any way.
The way lower interest rates are
supposed to work is that cheap money available to banks leads to
cheaper money for the consumer. You can already see that with the
number of 0.9% car financing signs on auto lots. I haven't seen this
since the early nineties when the Fed was desperately trying to
resuscitate the economy. Some worry that such drastic cuts in rates
will have limited impact on consumer sentiment and purchase
behaviour. Japan being the example cited most often. It could happen
here also if our financial institutions were in similar dire
conditions. Based on what I can gather from literature, the Japanese
consumer hardly benefits from the near zero cost of money. Bankrupt
financial institutions in Japan use the cheap source of cash to
extract another year of survival. Not so, here. Most banks are in
reasonable shape, at least for now. This may change if corporate
loans get worse.
The recession in early nineties had
a similar problem. No matter how low the rates went, industrial
companies like GM, GE and IBM did not react. The first real
beneficiary of the windfall was the bank and finance companies that
lend to consumers, for cars, houses and other consumer items.
Unfortunately, in the ensuing decade, most banks have embarked on a
campaign to diversify into riskier businesses such as mutual funds
and even direct equity into technology companies. That includes most
of our Canadian banks.
It is hard to find a so-called
"pure" old style bank that gets most of its business form
managing loans. There is some fear out there about the consumer
being stretched and debt levels being too high. But as long as the
job situation is reasonable and they can refinance their houses,
consumers do and will pay the significantly lower loan costs. Even
in the savings and loan disaster of the last decade, most consumers
did fork out the cash. Try to remember the last time your bank said
to you, times are tough so we forgive your loan. They will get your
house first.
I did find one; Seattle based
Washington Mutual (WM, NYSE), is
the largest thrift in the US, offering traditional consumer and
commercial banking (targeting small and mid-sized businesses)
through nearly 2,000 facilities across more than 40 states.
California accounts for the majority of WM's deposits and loans;
other key markets include Florida, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and
Washington. The thrift writes sub-prime real estate loans via its
Long Beach Mortgage unit; other segments provide specialty finance,
insurance, and investment management services. It is entering New
York City, the biggest banking market in the US, with its planned
acquisition of Dime Bancorp.
WM has also diversified out of
dependence on the spread business (borrowing cheap Fed money and
lending at higher rates) but majority of that diversification is
still in loan servicing and transaction fees. Recently the stock has
taken a tumble along with the rest of the market but nowhere near as
severely as the rest. There is of course the fear that this may be
the first time when massive loan losses may occur on account of the
debt-laden consumer.
Chart:
The P/E chart places full value for
this stock at 15 times this year's earnings of $2.88. Even if there
is no growth in EPS this year, WM trades at a 20% discount to fair
value. Analysts actually expect a fair growth to $3.57 a share but I
am not holding my breath. As in nearly every situation the estimates
may come down.

The following information was used
to compute fundamental value of WM:
EPS, this year 2.88, next year 3.57
Beta 0.7 Plowback 70% Debt/Equity 50% Return on Equity 17%
|