|
Microsoft
Corporation (MSFT, NASDAQ)
One
of the age old investment strategy is to buy low and when most think
that the outlook can't get worse. This simple strategy could have
made you quite rich without taking too much risk if you followed it rigorously,
even in times when it was tough to eke out a return. The key to remember
when embarking on such a bottom-fishing strategy, is to know well
what the ultimate downside risk may be. Just a few months ago, if
someone had told me that I will be analyzing Microsoft corporation
as a candidate for bottom fishing, I would not have believed it. But
as luck would have it, here we are.
You
know what Microsoft is famous for, its windows operating software
and a number of applications that run on this platform. These two
businesses account for approximately 40% each of the company's
revenues and the balance 20% is in other consumer products. You can
now see why the government wants to break this company into two or
three units. In many ways, Microsoft is already prepared to split
into such units. The big question in the minds of current and prospective
investors, is what will such a split do to the company's bottom
line. Even long term fans of Microsoft have said that such a slit
would reduce the intrinsic value of Microsoft stock.
First
of all, let me look the value after split question. Microsoft has
never been a buy because of its intrinsic value and so if its value
based on parts is lower than what it would be without, it is not
worth worrying. If that sum-of-parts value is significantly higher
than the current stock price of $61, it is still a great deal.
However, I don't agree that the split parts are likely to create
less valuable parts, in the long run. Shorter term, the question is irrelevant
because if you are buying a tech stock for a short term flip, you
are in a camp I don't wish to join.
Why
do I think, splitting the company will not reduce its value, long
term? Take Windows for example, this product did not exist 15 years
ago and had a very small revenue base for years after. I used the
predecessor operating systems back then; products like Framework,
DOS and the Apple. None of these were bad products but they all
lacked a key attribute, the ability to adapt to the user quickly and
efficiently. Microsoft did and they have the market. Did they come
up with the most innovative product of the curing-cancer ilk, not at
all. I can repeat exactly the same argument for Excel, Publisher,
Word and even Internet Explorer. Did Microsoft break some laws in
the process? Probably but do I care, no again. Would Oracle or Sun
Microsystems or even Netscape have produced an easy to use, well
supported and cheap software for me if it was not for Microsoft. I
have my doubts.
The
bigger question from an investment viewpoint is what is the stock
going to do next. Whether the company is broken or not, as long as
the developers including Bill Gates are in the business and with the
company, they will be making new products at cheap prices and with
mass appeal. They know how to do that and no one else in their
business has figured this secret out yet. And until some one
surfaces with that bent and intellect, I will bet
that this company will keep getting your software dollars. And as
long as that keeps happening, your investments will grow, sooner or
later.
Does
that mean you should go and buy the stock this morning. Don't ask me
about timing, I am no technician.
CHARTS:
I
am not about to classify MSFT
anything but
a growth company. The full value for MSFT is 50 times its earnings, a level which will probably not reache d
as long as the monopoly-busters are on its case. It has always
traded at that level historically, though.
The
forecast EPS numbers range
from $1.67 this year to $1.87 for 2001. Using last year's actual
results as the low case we shoul d
be getting to the $90 range when the pall is over. That is a 50%
return for some one brave enough.
Following
inputs were used to derive the fundamental P/E;
Return
on Equity 25%
Beta
1.60 Debt/Capital 0% Plowback
100%
Last Updated May 12,
2000
|