|
Intel
Corporation (INTC, NASDAQ)
Whenever
I think of technology, the vision of fast growing high risk,
uncertain profits and computers come to mind. That vision is no more
than preconditioned conventional wisdom, for many of the leading
high tech companies are quickly changing themselves into solid long
term growth companies. A handful of companies is leading this charge
and Intel is one of those select few, along with Microsoft, Motorola
and Texas Instruments.
This
does not mean that there are no more small and fast growing high
tech companies. There are dozens. But they are still part of the
conventional picture. Whether they will ever reach the same pinnacle
of success as Intel has, may very well depend upon whether their
strategies resemble those of Intel or not.
Intel
started out with a niche strategy a few years ago, building on the
success of PC markets. But as other semiconductor manufacturers, it
learned that the niche strategy only works if the niche you have
selected doesn't remain a niche forever. It eventually turns to
commodity except that by that time the originator has the lion's
share. The business world is full of products and services that
never achieved notoriety like the pet rock or the HDTV. It takes lot
more than a great idea to make the world beat the path down to your
door.
Intel
recognized early on that its niche had significant potential. If
PC's were living entities, Intel's products called the
microprocessors or CPU's would be their heart. But the simile ends
right there because this heart is evolving at an incredible rate. No
more than five years ago, the company
tested
its first success by introducing what is called a 386 computer chip,
making all the previous PC hearts outdated in one fell swoop. Not
only did it quickly became the standard for most desktop PC but gave
the first hint to the manufacturers that need for speed is long from
satiated.
You
may reach your own limit in speed when driving a car because of the
impending doom should you crash or be just unable to handle the
speed. Having no such
restriction when driving a PC--what's it going to do, recalculate
your next year's taxes even before you clicked the mouse and send a
copy to Revenue Canada--we want more. I suppose the terminal speed
for PC's is our mental reaction time which is fast. How fast? Well,
how long does it take you to add 6 to 8 in your mind?
Almost
every couple of years, skeptics have raised a red flag as to the
limits placed by Physics on the speed silicon chips can generate.
But simple technical problems never stopped the scientists, next
phase of computer systems are based on lasers or neurons, each,
orders of magnitude faster than silicon.
Given
the complexity of these technologies and the competitiveness of
sharp minds, it is quite a feat that Intel has over 80% of the PC
market. Their strategy is based on pure research and development. They simply
outsmart all other developers in the field in creating, testing and
introducing new products that are far superior to their own previous
generations. Competitors in their niche, like AMD, CYRIX and even
IBM and Motorola just can't get there fast enough.
There
may however be a limit to this geometrical progression of speed if
the financial results are any indication. Intel's return on equity
is now a mere 24% which is high but not what you would call stellar
and their sales growth is dependent upon that fickle home PC buyer.
The home PC could go the way of
colour TV, VCR and microwave ovens-- necessary but cheap. And
the next phase in Intel's growth may take some doing. In other
words, this niche too is showing its age and may be turning into
commodity. Just like the actual PC manufacturers such as IBM, Apple,
Compaq and Dell. How they manage this next phase in their
development will be crucial in determining what price we would pay
for Intel as a stock; 30 times EPS or 10.
CHARTS:
One
of the first surprising result I found in this analysis is the P/E
chart. It shows that in spite of all the excitement, Intel has very
quickly transformed into just a growth company rather than a
supercharged explosive stock. The full value for Intel is only 20 times its earnings, significantly
lower than many others we have reviewed here. What we are witnessing
is the transformation of a speculative stock into a long term
profitable enterprise.
The
forecast EPS numbers range
from $4 to $6 for 1996. I am using last year's actual results as the
low case and $4 for the be st
case. If you can live with only a mild growth next year, there is
still a $20 reward if the stock achieves its fundamental value of
$80.
Following
inputs were used to derive the fundamental P/E;
Return
on Equity 20%
Beta
1.40 Debt/Capital 0% Plowback
90%
Last Updated May 12,
2000
|